Practice Prevent Problem Behaviours
-
Module Introduction2 Topics
-
Delivered With Fidelity22 Topics|2 Tests
-
Cover
-
Module Objective
-
What Happens When Preventing Problem Behaviours is Delivered with Mastery
-
The Process of How to Prevent Problem Behaviours
-
The Process for Preventing Problem Behaviours
-
The Teacher Plans for Potential Problems
-
The Impact of Planning for Potential Problems
-
The Teacher Uses Prompting
-
The Impact of Using Prompting
-
The Teacher Uses Pre-Correcting
-
The Impact of Using Pre-Correcting
-
Video: Pre-correcting Before Beginning a New Activity
-
The Teacher Uses Physical Proximity
-
The Impact of Using Physical Proximity
-
Check Your Understanding
-
The Teacher Uses Signals
-
The Impact of Using Signals
-
The Teacher Removes Distractions
-
The Impact of Removing Distractions
-
The Teacher Implements Intermittent Breaks
-
The Impact of Using Intermittent Breaks
-
Test Your Understanding
-
Cover
-
Not Delivered With Fidelity18 Topics|2 Tests
-
Cover
-
What Happens When Prevention of Problem Behaviours is Not Delivered with Fidelity
-
The Teacher Does Not Plan for Potential Problems
-
The Impact of Not Planning for Potential Problems
-
The Teacher Does Not Use Prompting
-
The Impact of Not Using Prompting
-
The Teacher Does Not Use Pre-Correcting
-
The Impact of Not Using Pre-Correcting
-
The Teacher Does Not Use Physical Proximity
-
The Impact of Not Using Physical Proximity
-
Check Your Understanding
-
The Teacher Does Not Use Signals
-
The Impact of Not Using Signals
-
The Teacher Does Not Remove Distractions
-
The Impact of Not Removing Distractions
-
The Teacher Does Not Implement Intermittent Breaks
-
The Impact of Not using Intermittent Breaks
-
Test Your Understanding
-
Cover
-
Barriers That Impede Fidelity10 Topics|2 Tests
-
Cover
-
Barriers That Impede Delivering Prevention of Problem Behaviours with Fidelity
-
Using Deductive Logic to Identify the Cause of the Barrier
-
Not Understanding Why Prevention of Problem Behaviour is Required
-
Do Not Know How to Prevent Problem Behaviour
-
Does Not Plan Time for Re-teaching Rules and Routines
-
Check Your Understanding
-
Teacher Relies on Reactive Behaviour Techniques
-
Teacher Does Not Regularly Assess the Energy Level of the Classroom
-
Test Your Understanding
-
Cover
-
Removing Barriers That Impede Fidelity15 Topics|2 Tests
-
Cover
-
Ways to Tackle Barriers So Prevention of Problem Behaviour is Delivered with Fidelity
-
Tackling the Barrier of Not Understanding Why Preventing Problem Behaviours is Required
-
Process
-
Tackling the Barrier of Not Knowing How to Prevent Problem Behaviours
-
Process
-
Tackling the Barrier of Not Planning Time for Re-teaching Rules and Routines
-
Process
-
Check Your Understanding
-
Tackling the Barrier of Relying on Reactive Behaviour Techniques
-
Tackling the Barrier of Relying on Reactive Behaviour Techniques
-
Tackling the Barrier of Not Regularly Assessing the Energy Level of the Classroom
-
Process
-
Video: Setting Students Up for Success
-
Test Your Understanding
-
Cover
-
Module Completion Survey1 Topic
The Impact of Not Planning for Potential Problems
Jane Emperado September 25, 2024

The Impact of Not Planning for Potential Problems
Step 1: Teacher Marcus is planning a science experiment for his students that will involve using new and exciting materials. Due to lack of time, Marcus does not prepare the materials or the space ahead of time.
Step 2: Marcus does not rearrange the room’s seating for the experiment because he feels that if any issues arise during the lesson, he can move students or change partnerships as needed.
Step 3: During the experiment, Marcus needed to spend about 15 minutes passing out the materials one at a time. Marcus did not write directions on the board before the distribution of materials, so his students were unsure what to do with them. Some students were playing with their materials while they waited. Marcus needed to stop and address this issue with multiple students. Marcus finally passed out the materials and began he experiment. Students who needed extra support had trouble following the directions because they were not placed near Marcus.
Step 4: Unfortunately, with all the interruptions and time wasted from dealing with behavioural interruptions, Marcus could not finish the experiment with his students. He needed to carry the experiment over into the afternoon which meant he needed to omit another activity to ensure enough time to finish. This put Marcus behind in his plans.